2024 : 11 : 21
mehdi Ramezanzadeh

mehdi Ramezanzadeh

Academic rank: Associate Professor
ORCID:
Education: PhD.
ScopusId:
HIndex: 0/00
Faculty: Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences
Address:
Phone: 09126343108

Research

Title
Predicting temporal and spatial variability in flood vulnerability and risk of rural communities at the watershed scale
Type
JournalPaper
Keywords
Flood management Flood probability Machine learning models Kruskal-wallis-test The tajan watershed
Year
2022
Journal JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT
DOI
Researchers Mohammadtaghi Avand ، Hamidreza Moradi ، mehdi Ramezanzadeh

Abstract

Due to land-use and hydrology changes, people are constantly exposed to floods. The adverse impact of floods is greater on vulnerable populations that disproportionately inhabit flood-prone areas. This paper reports a comprehensive study on flood vulnerability of flood prone areas in residential areas of the Tajan watershed, Iran in two periods before 2006 and after 2006. Flood prone area were determined by the random forest (RF) and K-nearest neighbor (KNN) machine learning methods. To reduce time and cost, the vulnerability was assessed only in areas with very high flood hazard using 4 main criteria (social, policy, economic, infrastructure), 40 items, and 210 questionnaires across 40 villages. Independent t-test, Kruskal-Wallis, and paired t-test were used for statistical analysis of questionnaire data. The results of machine learning models (MLMs) showed that the RF model with AUC = 0.92% is more accurate in determining flood prone areas. The results of paired t-test showed that the three criteria of social (mean P1 = 2.97 and P2 = 3.35), infrastructure (mean P1 = 2.88 and P2 = 3.25), and policy (mean P1 = 3.02 and P2 = 3.50) had significant changes in both periods. The Kruskal-Wallis test also revealed the mean of all four criteria in both periods and all sub-watersheds, except three sub-watersheds 10 (Khalkhil village), 19 (Tellarem and Kerasp villages), and 23 (Dinehsar and Jafarabad), had a significant difference. The results of the t-test also showed a decrease in vulnerability in the second period (before 2006) compared to the first period (after 2006), so the number of sub-watersheds in the very high vulnerability class was more in the first period than in the second period. A vulnerability map was developed using three factors of risk zone area, area of each sub-watershed, and population of each sub-watershed. Journal of Environmental Management